A Hybrid Practice
![]()
Posters for Andreas’ talk on “Counterintuitive Typologies” combining his practice (corner), teaching (12 master’s theses) and research interests at the intersection of typolgies, adaptive reuse and continual building, Jan 2022.
As contemporary architecture shifts toward pragmatism, prioritizing economic and efficient design over the excesses of the digital age, it reflects a broader cultural recalibration. Though architecture constitutes only a small fraction of the global building industry, its impact on societal development remains profound, necessitating a nuanced understanding of its complex ecologies. Architectural practice is inherently hybrid, encompassing building, teaching, and research—each contributing to the discipline’s evolving landscape. In today’s rapidly changing world, architects must embrace multiple roles, positioning themselves as adaptable and critically engaged professionals capable of responding to intricate social, environmental, and technological challenges.
︎︎︎ Research statement
Posters for Andreas’ talk on “Counterintuitive Typologies” combining his practice (corner), teaching (12 master’s theses) and research interests at the intersection of typolgies, adaptive reuse and continual building, Jan 2022.
The Hybrid Practitioner in Architecture
Architecture extends beyond mere building; it is a comprehensive discipline that incorporates theory, history, technology, and the societal impact of the built environment. Although architecture comprises only a limited fraction of the building industry, its influence on societal development is profound. A nuanced understanding of its hybrid nature is crucial for addressing contemporary challenges effectively. As Caroline Voet, Eireen Schreurs, and Helen Thomas (2022) argue in The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture, architects operate in multiple capacities that bridge academic inquiry with practical application. This perspective fosters an integrative approach that allows for the exploration of adaptive reuse, building typology, and environmental sustainability.
Voet et al. (2022) introduce the concept of the hybrid practitioner—one who seamlessly combines design, teaching, research, and various other roles to enrich architectural discourse and practice. The book is structured into five thematic parts, examining the interconnections between practice, education, cross-disciplinary engagements, reflective drawing, and sustainability. Through this framework, the hybrid approach emerges as an essential methodology for navigating the complexities of contemporary architecture.
Drawing as a Mediating Tool in Hybrid Practice
Drawings play a crucial role in the intersecting practices of designing, teaching, and researching architecture. As a medium, drawings facilitate a unique form of knowledge production, characterized by their inherent ambiguity and their ability to function as instrumental, representational, and speculative tools. This hybridity allows for a dynamic engagement with spatial relationships, mapping ecological interconnections between architecture, renovation, adaptive reuse, and broader urban and landscape contexts.
In critical practice, drawing serves as a bridge between architectural production and theoretical inquiry. It enables practitioners to explore design ideologies while simultaneously engaging with material realities. As demonstrated in Andreas’ talk on *Counterintuitive Typologies* (2022), the integration of practice (corner), teaching (twelve master’s theses), and research interests at the intersection of typologies, adaptive reuse, and continual building exemplifies the hybrid nature of architectural production. This intersectional approach acknowledges the complexity and context-dependency of architectural work, advocating for research-driven teaching as a means to confront the discipline’s hybrid essence.
### Architectural Pedagogy and Hybrid Practices
One of the fundamental aspects of hybrid practice is its impact on architectural pedagogy. Education serves as a platform for knowledge exchange between academia and professional practice. By integrating research and design within architectural curricula, educators can prepare students for the diverse challenges of contemporary practice. Voet and Schenk’s (2022) *Lost and Found* design studio exemplifies this approach, merging intuition and precision in architectural education. This pedagogical model aligns with Christoph Grafe’s (2022) assertion that architects function as “organic intellectuals,” bridging the gap between academic discourse and the practical realities of the profession.
Teaching, as a component of hybrid practice, reinforces the reciprocal relationship between research and design. The exploration of adaptive reuse and building typology through research-driven teaching encourages students to engage critically with architectural history while addressing contemporary issues such as sustainability and urban resilience. This iterative process of learning and application fosters a more comprehensive understanding of the discipline, ensuring that emerging architects are well-equipped to navigate the evolving landscape of architectural practice.
### Sustainability and Hybrid Architectural Approaches
The hybrid nature of architectural practice is particularly relevant in the context of sustainability. As Wilfried Wang (2022) argues, architecture must respond to both environmental concerns and cultural contexts. Hybrid practitioners, by engaging with diverse methodologies, can develop more nuanced and effective strategies for sustainable design. The intersection of research, education, and practice facilitates a holistic approach to sustainability, ensuring that architectural interventions are informed by theoretical discourse and empirical investigation.
Joseph Bedford (2022) highlights the role of digital media in contemporary architectural discourse, emphasizing the shift from traditional print-based criticism to new forms of online engagement. This transformation underscores the necessity of hybrid practice, where architects must navigate multiple modes of communication and knowledge dissemination. By integrating reflective practices such as drawing and writing, hybrid practitioners contribute to the ongoing dialogue surrounding sustainability and ecological resilience.
### Conclusion: The Future of Hybrid Architectural Practices
In an era of increasing complexity, hybrid architectural practices offer a model for addressing the multifaceted challenges facing the built environment. By integrating building, teaching, and researching as interconnected yet distinct practices, architects can foster a more dynamic and responsive discipline. The hybrid approach, as outlined by Voet et al. (2022), provides a framework for navigating the intersections of theory and practice, ensuring that architectural interventions are both contextually informed and forward-thinking.
As contemporary architecture continues to evolve, the role of hybrid practitioners will become increasingly vital. Their ability to bridge disciplinary boundaries, engage with pressing environmental and socio-political issues, and contribute to both academia and professional practice positions them as key agents of change. By embracing the hybrid nature of architectural production, practitioners can develop innovative strategies for adaptive reuse, sustainability, and resilient urban development, ultimately shaping the future of the built environment.
### References
- Bedford, J. (2022). *Stepping Back from the Object*. In C. Voet, E. Schreurs, & H. Thomas (Eds.), *The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture*. Leuven University Press. DOI: 10.11116/9789461664556- Grafe, C. (2022). *The Practice Perspective and Its Framework*. In C. Voet, E. Schreurs, & H. Thomas (Eds.), *The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture*. Leuven University Press.- Voet, C., Schenk, S. (2022). *Reciprocal Negotiations: Teaching Architecture*. In C. Voet, E. Schreurs, & H. Thomas (Eds.), *The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture*. Leuven University Press.- Wang, W. (2022). *Understanding Architecture*. In C. Voet, E. Schreurs, & H. Thomas (Eds.), *The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture*. Leuven University Press.
Further reading: Caroline Voet, Eireen Schreurs, Helen Thomas, eds. The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture, Leuven University Press 2022
![]()
DOI 10.11116/9789461664556
https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/58068
(Open Access)
"The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture," edited by Caroline Voet, Eireen Schreurs, and Helen Thomas, offers a comprehensive examination of the multifaceted roles architects assume in contemporary practice. The book introduces the concept of the "hybrid practitioner," an architect who seamlessly integrates various professional activities—such as designing, teaching, consulting, publishing, drawing, and writing—to bridge the gap between academia and practical application. This integrative approach fosters a dynamic interplay between architectural theory, history, and hands-on practice, enriching the discipline and addressing contemporary challenges.
Structured into five thematic parts, the book delves into different dimensions of hybrid practice:
1. The Practice Perspective and Its Framework: This section explores the dynamic relationship between architectural practice and the development of theory and history. It emphasizes how observing, designing, and writing are intertwined in the creative process, challenging the traditional boundaries between theory and practice. For instance, Christoph Grafe discusses the role of architects as "organic intellectuals," highlighting the importance of bridging the gap between academic discourse and practical application.
2. Reciprocal Negotiations: Teaching Architecture: Focusing on the educational sphere, this part examines how teaching serves as a platform for knowledge exchange between academia and practice. It presents various pedagogical approaches that integrate practical experience with theoretical study, fostering a learning environment that mirrors the hybrid nature of contemporary practice. For example, Caroline Voet and Steven Schenk discuss the "Lost and Found" design studio, which emphasizes the integration of intuition and precision in architectural education.
3. Different Worlds and Other Places: This section delves into the diverse contexts in which hybrid practitioners operate, highlighting the importance of adaptability and cross-disciplinary engagement. It underscores how architects navigate various cultural, social, and political landscapes, enriching their practice through a broader understanding of different environments. Sepideh Karami's chapter, "Starting from the Mess," explores how embracing complexity and uncertainty can lead to innovative design solutions.
4. Stepping Back from the Object: Here, the focus shifts to reflective practices that allow architects to critically assess their work and its broader implications. This part discusses how activities like drawing and writing serve as tools for reflection, enabling practitioners to engage deeply with their work and its impact on society. Joseph Bedford's chapter examines the role of digital media in contemporary architectural discourse, highlighting the shift from traditional print-based criticism to new forms of online engagement.
5. Understanding Architecture: The final section synthesizes the insights from the previous parts, offering a holistic understanding of architecture as a discipline enriched by hybrid practices. It emphasizes the importance of integrating various roles and perspectives to address complex challenges in the built environment. Wilfried Wang's chapter discusses the cultural dimensions of sustainability, advocating for an architecture that is responsive to both environmental concerns and cultural contexts.
Throughout the book, the editors and contributors advocate for a holistic approach to architecture, where academic pursuits and professional practice are not seen as separate entities but as interconnected facets of a single discipline. This perspective encourages architects to engage with a broader spectrum of activities, enriching their practice and contributing to the field's evolution. "The Hybrid Practitioner" also serves as a valuable resource for students and educators, offering insights into how architectural education can evolve to prepare future practitioners for these multifaceted roles. It suggests that curricula should integrate practical experience with theoretical study, fostering a learning environment that mirrors the hybrid nature of contemporary practice In summary, "The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture" presents a compelling argument for the integration of various professional activities within architectural practice. By bridging the gap between academia and practice, and embracing roles beyond traditional design, architects can enrich their work and contribute more profoundly to the built environment and society at large:
Architecture extends beyond mere building; it is a comprehensive discipline that incorporates theory, history, technology, and the societal impact of the built environment. Although architecture comprises only a limited fraction of the building industry, its influence on societal development is profound. A nuanced understanding of its hybrid nature is crucial for addressing contemporary challenges effectively. As Caroline Voet, Eireen Schreurs, and Helen Thomas (2022) argue in The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture, architects operate in multiple capacities that bridge academic inquiry with practical application. This perspective fosters an integrative approach that allows for the exploration of adaptive reuse, building typology, and environmental sustainability.
Voet et al. (2022) introduce the concept of the hybrid practitioner—one who seamlessly combines design, teaching, research, and various other roles to enrich architectural discourse and practice. The book is structured into five thematic parts, examining the interconnections between practice, education, cross-disciplinary engagements, reflective drawing, and sustainability. Through this framework, the hybrid approach emerges as an essential methodology for navigating the complexities of contemporary architecture.
Drawing as a Mediating Tool in Hybrid Practice
Drawings play a crucial role in the intersecting practices of designing, teaching, and researching architecture. As a medium, drawings facilitate a unique form of knowledge production, characterized by their inherent ambiguity and their ability to function as instrumental, representational, and speculative tools. This hybridity allows for a dynamic engagement with spatial relationships, mapping ecological interconnections between architecture, renovation, adaptive reuse, and broader urban and landscape contexts.
In critical practice, drawing serves as a bridge between architectural production and theoretical inquiry. It enables practitioners to explore design ideologies while simultaneously engaging with material realities. As demonstrated in Andreas’ talk on *Counterintuitive Typologies* (2022), the integration of practice (corner), teaching (twelve master’s theses), and research interests at the intersection of typologies, adaptive reuse, and continual building exemplifies the hybrid nature of architectural production. This intersectional approach acknowledges the complexity and context-dependency of architectural work, advocating for research-driven teaching as a means to confront the discipline’s hybrid essence.
### Architectural Pedagogy and Hybrid Practices
One of the fundamental aspects of hybrid practice is its impact on architectural pedagogy. Education serves as a platform for knowledge exchange between academia and professional practice. By integrating research and design within architectural curricula, educators can prepare students for the diverse challenges of contemporary practice. Voet and Schenk’s (2022) *Lost and Found* design studio exemplifies this approach, merging intuition and precision in architectural education. This pedagogical model aligns with Christoph Grafe’s (2022) assertion that architects function as “organic intellectuals,” bridging the gap between academic discourse and the practical realities of the profession.
Teaching, as a component of hybrid practice, reinforces the reciprocal relationship between research and design. The exploration of adaptive reuse and building typology through research-driven teaching encourages students to engage critically with architectural history while addressing contemporary issues such as sustainability and urban resilience. This iterative process of learning and application fosters a more comprehensive understanding of the discipline, ensuring that emerging architects are well-equipped to navigate the evolving landscape of architectural practice.
### Sustainability and Hybrid Architectural Approaches
The hybrid nature of architectural practice is particularly relevant in the context of sustainability. As Wilfried Wang (2022) argues, architecture must respond to both environmental concerns and cultural contexts. Hybrid practitioners, by engaging with diverse methodologies, can develop more nuanced and effective strategies for sustainable design. The intersection of research, education, and practice facilitates a holistic approach to sustainability, ensuring that architectural interventions are informed by theoretical discourse and empirical investigation.
Joseph Bedford (2022) highlights the role of digital media in contemporary architectural discourse, emphasizing the shift from traditional print-based criticism to new forms of online engagement. This transformation underscores the necessity of hybrid practice, where architects must navigate multiple modes of communication and knowledge dissemination. By integrating reflective practices such as drawing and writing, hybrid practitioners contribute to the ongoing dialogue surrounding sustainability and ecological resilience.
### Conclusion: The Future of Hybrid Architectural Practices
In an era of increasing complexity, hybrid architectural practices offer a model for addressing the multifaceted challenges facing the built environment. By integrating building, teaching, and researching as interconnected yet distinct practices, architects can foster a more dynamic and responsive discipline. The hybrid approach, as outlined by Voet et al. (2022), provides a framework for navigating the intersections of theory and practice, ensuring that architectural interventions are both contextually informed and forward-thinking.
As contemporary architecture continues to evolve, the role of hybrid practitioners will become increasingly vital. Their ability to bridge disciplinary boundaries, engage with pressing environmental and socio-political issues, and contribute to both academia and professional practice positions them as key agents of change. By embracing the hybrid nature of architectural production, practitioners can develop innovative strategies for adaptive reuse, sustainability, and resilient urban development, ultimately shaping the future of the built environment.
### References
- Bedford, J. (2022). *Stepping Back from the Object*. In C. Voet, E. Schreurs, & H. Thomas (Eds.), *The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture*. Leuven University Press. DOI: 10.11116/9789461664556- Grafe, C. (2022). *The Practice Perspective and Its Framework*. In C. Voet, E. Schreurs, & H. Thomas (Eds.), *The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture*. Leuven University Press.- Voet, C., Schenk, S. (2022). *Reciprocal Negotiations: Teaching Architecture*. In C. Voet, E. Schreurs, & H. Thomas (Eds.), *The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture*. Leuven University Press.- Wang, W. (2022). *Understanding Architecture*. In C. Voet, E. Schreurs, & H. Thomas (Eds.), *The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture*. Leuven University Press.
Further reading: Caroline Voet, Eireen Schreurs, Helen Thomas, eds. The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture, Leuven University Press 2022
DOI 10.11116/9789461664556
https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/58068
(Open Access)
"The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture," edited by Caroline Voet, Eireen Schreurs, and Helen Thomas, offers a comprehensive examination of the multifaceted roles architects assume in contemporary practice. The book introduces the concept of the "hybrid practitioner," an architect who seamlessly integrates various professional activities—such as designing, teaching, consulting, publishing, drawing, and writing—to bridge the gap between academia and practical application. This integrative approach fosters a dynamic interplay between architectural theory, history, and hands-on practice, enriching the discipline and addressing contemporary challenges.
Structured into five thematic parts, the book delves into different dimensions of hybrid practice:
1. The Practice Perspective and Its Framework: This section explores the dynamic relationship between architectural practice and the development of theory and history. It emphasizes how observing, designing, and writing are intertwined in the creative process, challenging the traditional boundaries between theory and practice. For instance, Christoph Grafe discusses the role of architects as "organic intellectuals," highlighting the importance of bridging the gap between academic discourse and practical application.
2. Reciprocal Negotiations: Teaching Architecture: Focusing on the educational sphere, this part examines how teaching serves as a platform for knowledge exchange between academia and practice. It presents various pedagogical approaches that integrate practical experience with theoretical study, fostering a learning environment that mirrors the hybrid nature of contemporary practice. For example, Caroline Voet and Steven Schenk discuss the "Lost and Found" design studio, which emphasizes the integration of intuition and precision in architectural education.
3. Different Worlds and Other Places: This section delves into the diverse contexts in which hybrid practitioners operate, highlighting the importance of adaptability and cross-disciplinary engagement. It underscores how architects navigate various cultural, social, and political landscapes, enriching their practice through a broader understanding of different environments. Sepideh Karami's chapter, "Starting from the Mess," explores how embracing complexity and uncertainty can lead to innovative design solutions.
4. Stepping Back from the Object: Here, the focus shifts to reflective practices that allow architects to critically assess their work and its broader implications. This part discusses how activities like drawing and writing serve as tools for reflection, enabling practitioners to engage deeply with their work and its impact on society. Joseph Bedford's chapter examines the role of digital media in contemporary architectural discourse, highlighting the shift from traditional print-based criticism to new forms of online engagement.
5. Understanding Architecture: The final section synthesizes the insights from the previous parts, offering a holistic understanding of architecture as a discipline enriched by hybrid practices. It emphasizes the importance of integrating various roles and perspectives to address complex challenges in the built environment. Wilfried Wang's chapter discusses the cultural dimensions of sustainability, advocating for an architecture that is responsive to both environmental concerns and cultural contexts.
Throughout the book, the editors and contributors advocate for a holistic approach to architecture, where academic pursuits and professional practice are not seen as separate entities but as interconnected facets of a single discipline. This perspective encourages architects to engage with a broader spectrum of activities, enriching their practice and contributing to the field's evolution. "The Hybrid Practitioner" also serves as a valuable resource for students and educators, offering insights into how architectural education can evolve to prepare future practitioners for these multifaceted roles. It suggests that curricula should integrate practical experience with theoretical study, fostering a learning environment that mirrors the hybrid nature of contemporary practice In summary, "The Hybrid Practitioner: Building, Teaching, Researching Architecture" presents a compelling argument for the integration of various professional activities within architectural practice. By bridging the gap between academia and practice, and embracing roles beyond traditional design, architects can enrich their work and contribute more profoundly to the built environment and society at large:
“But if there is a sense of reality, and no one will doubt that it has its justification for existing, then there must also be something we can call a sense of possibility.
Whoever has it does not say, for instance: Here this or that has happened, will happen, must happen; but he invents: Here this or that might, could, or ought to happen If he is told that something is the way it is, he will think: Well, it could probably just as well be otherwise.”
― Robert Musil, The Man Without Qualities (1930)
Attemsgasse 11
8010 Graz, Austria
Staatlich befugter und beeideter Ziviltechniker
© Studio Andreas Lechner. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise stated, all materials on this website and the ideas incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights belonging to Andreas Lechner, its affiliates or its licensors and all such rights are hereby asserted and reserved. No part of this website may be copied, reproduced, republished, posted, transmitted or distributed in any way for commercial purposes. Any modification or use of the information contained on this website for any purpose not explicitly permitted without prior written consent is a violation of the author’s intellectual property rights and is strictly prohibited.
︎︎︎Site Map, Imprint & DSGVO
Unless otherwise stated, all materials on this website and the ideas incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights belonging to Andreas Lechner, its affiliates or its licensors and all such rights are hereby asserted and reserved. No part of this website may be copied, reproduced, republished, posted, transmitted or distributed in any way for commercial purposes. Any modification or use of the information contained on this website for any purpose not explicitly permitted without prior written consent is a violation of the author’s intellectual property rights and is strictly prohibited.
︎︎︎Site Map, Imprint & DSGVO