Peripheries – Peripherocene


Peripheries – Peripherocene is a collaborative research initiative led by Cameron McEwan (Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne) and Andreas Lechner (TU Graz), which investigates the dynamic intersections between Anthropocenic conditions and the spatial, social, and conceptual production of urban peripheries. Launched with a symposium in Newcastle in 2023 and further explored in the thematic session “Peripheries” at the AHRA 2023 Conference: Situated Ecologies of Care (University of Portsmouth), the project is currently preparing a Special Issue of The Journal of Architecture (RIBA), to be published in 2026.



︎︎︎More
 


Bernhard Ogrisek, Das Infra-Gewöhliche, Master’s Thesis TU Graz (2022). 


Aldo Rossi’s extension of the Cimiterio di Ponte Sesto in Rozzano with G. Da Pozzo and F.S. Fera (1989–1995), Viale alberato with chapel, Southern Periphery of Milan, March 2023, Photo: © Andreas Lechner


Core Group 2023

Cameron McEwan (Northumbria University + AE Foundation)


Andreas Lechner (TU Graz + Studio Andreas Lechner)


Elisa Iturbe (Harvard GSD + Outside Development)


Joe Wojewoda (Northumbria University)


Lee Ann McIlroy (Northumbria University + University of Dundee)


Lorens Holm (University of Dundee)


Neil Gillespie (Reiach & Hall + Scott Sutherland School of Architecture)


Sandra Bartoli (Büros für Konstruktivismus + Munich University of
Applied Sciences)


Silvan Linden (Büros für Konstruktivismus)


Yamina Saheb (OpenExp)

Reframing Peripheries in the Era of the Anthropocene

Today’s peripheries are plural and planetary: encompassing suburbs, exurbs, favelas, informal settlements, logistics zones, old villages, and new towns. They form what Ignasi de Solà-Morales called terrain vague—ambiguous spaces full of latent potential (Solà-Morales, 1995). These geographies are shaped by contradictory forces of capital, migration, ecology, infrastructure, and state control. As such, the periphery is not a homogeneous condition but a multifaceted and dynamic terrain. Processes of peripherization—defined by uneven development, environmental degradation, and spatial marginalization—are exacerbated by crises of capitalism, climate, and care (Kühn, 2014). These processes increasingly shape rural and remote territories far beyond metropolitan cores, creating hybrid zones of agriculture, extractivism, and speculative development.

In The Architecture of the City, Aldo Rossi proposed the city as a locus of collective memory, with urban artifacts, typologies, and structures expressing an “urban imaginary” (Rossi, 1982). While his analysis emphasized the historical city centre, the twenty-first century presents a different urban paradigm where the rigid dichotomies of centre and periphery have dissolved into sprawling, discontinuous, and hybridized landscapes shaped by processes of extended urbanisation (Brenner & Schmid, 2015).

The periphery, long seen as residual or secondary, increasingly defines the dominant condition of contemporary urban life. Georges Perec’s attention to the everyday, the banal, and the habitual (Perec, 1997) compels us to reconsider peripheral territories as primary expressions of collective life, containing their own monuments, memories, and spatial logics.


Key Research Questions

Our research poses urgent and generative questions:

1. What is the Peripheral Imaginary?
If Rossi employed categories such as type, locus, permanence, and monument to understand the city, what interpretive tools can help us theorize the periphery? What are the typologies, symbols, and spatial figures that shape peripheral imaginaries?

2. What Constitutes Peripheral Memory and Identity?
Peripheries, too, are carriers of memory and history. How do built forms and urban patterns reflect the lived experience of peripheral life? Who remembers the periphery, and how?

3. How Are Peripheries Reconfigured in the Anthropocene?
The Anthropocene—a term marking the deep entanglement of natural and human systems (Crutzen & Stoermer, 2000; Haraway, 2016)—challenges traditional urban categories. How are peripheries transformed by infrastructural intensification, resource extraction, environmental displacement, and new forms of political governance?




Theoretical Contributions and Methods

We seek to build a spatial, representational, and theoretical lexicon on peripheries that integrates insights from architecture, urban theory, political ecology, and environmental humanities.

Key contributions will explore:

Extended Urbanisation: Following Brenner and Schmid (2015), we conceptualize the periphery as integral to global urban restructuring, including hinterlands, supply chains, and sites of dispossession.

Planetary Urbanism: Urbanization is no longer confined to cities; it is a planetary process (Angelo & Wachsmuth, 2020).

Peripheral Monuments: New typologies and icons emerge not from central institutions but from infrastructural, vernacular, or marginal architectures (Lechner, 2021).
Critical Representation: From cartography to photography, we explore visual and conceptual strategies to render the invisible geographies of the periphery visible and legible (Corner, 1999).



Emerging Themes and Calls for Contribution

Voices from the Periphery: 
Who inhabits, governs, and narrates the periphery?How do political and economic systems create peripheral conditions?What affective registers—love, loathing, longing—emerge in the lived experiences of peripheral life?

Picturing the Periphery:What are the visual, formal, and typological manifestations of the periphery?How can peripheries be drawn, photographed, mapped, or modelled to capture their complexity?What are the representational tools required for a “critical cartography” of peripheral space?
The Anthropocenic Periphery

How do infrastructures, ecologies, and institutions produce peripheries under Anthropocenic pressures?
What new models of settlement, adaptation, and resistance emerge in these zones?
How do notions of care, resilience, and spatial justice inform our understanding of peripheries?





References


Angelo, H., & Wachsmuth, D. (2020). Why does everyone think cities can save the planet? Urban Studies, 57(11), 2201–2221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020919081

Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19(2–3), 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712

Corner, J. (1999). The agency of mapping: Speculation, critique and invention. In D. Cosgrove (Ed.), Mappings(pp. 213–252). Reaktion Books.

Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The “Anthropocene”. IGBP Newsletter, 41, 17–18.

Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. 

Kühn, M. (2014). Peripheralization: Theoretical Concepts Explaining Socio-Spatial Inequalities. European Planning Studies, 23(2), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.862518 

Lechner, A. (2021). Thinking Design: Blueprint for an Architecture of Typology. Park Books. 

Perec, G. (1997). Species of Spaces and Other Pieces. Penguin Books.

Pope, A. (2024). Inverse Utopia: Urbanism and the Great Acceleration, Birkhäuser.

Rossi, A. (1982). The Architecture of the City. MIT Press.

Solà-Morales, I. de (1995). Terrain vague. In C. Davidson (Ed.), Anyplace (pp. 118–123). MIT Press.


Counterintuitive Typologies



Counterintuitive Typologies is both the title and guiding principle for Andreas Lechner’s research group at TU Graz, encompassing design studios, supervised master’s theses, international collaborations, and funded research projects. It proposes a redefinition of typology not as static form but as cultural critique, positioning architectural types as historically embedded yet continuously mutable structures. Capable of both poetic resonance and ecological engagement the groups overarching goal is to tackle contemporary urban challenges—such as the critical need for urban infill and city densification—by integrating upcycling, adaption and reuse of existing structures. The project seeks to bridge and critically advance the epistemology of architecture, particularly when juxtaposing cultural significance with the tangible themes of circularity. Counterintuitive Typologies comprises design studios at TU Graz, PhD seminars at Milan Polytechnic, a number of master’s theses, various peer reviewed publications and papers as well as a research collaboration on "Peripheries - Peripherocene" with Northumbria University.︎︎︎www.CounterintuitiveTypologies.com. 



︎︎︎More



Fig. 1 Robert Venturi’s “Recommendation for a monument” (1972) next to Madrid PKMN Architectures greenish update from 2014.Fig. 1 
Robert Venturi’s Recommendation for a Monument (1972) alongside PKMN Architecture’s green-hued reinterpretation from 2014.



Fig. 2
Appended brochure “Counterintuitve Typologies“ featuring 12 master’s theses (2015–2021) exploring peripheral and commercial vernaculars through precise drawings and conceptual revaluation of 
city edges, infrastructural voids, continuous building and future monuments, in: Andreas Lechner, Thinking Design - Blueprint for an Architecture of Typology, Zurich: Park Books 2021.



Fig. 3 
144 project floor plans drawn at same scale from Thinking Design - Blueprint for an Architecture of Typology, Zurich: Park Books 2021.


Fig. 4
Poster for the TU Graz Architectural Research Lecture Series, Winter Semester 2021/22. Counterintuitive Typologies was launched as part of the series on January 20, 2022.


Between Critique, Care, and Ecological Reuse

Counterintuitive Typologies is Andreas Lechner’s critical design and research initiative addressing architecture’s contemporary entanglements with aesthetic commodification, ecological degradation, and institutional inertia. Rooted in the concept of continual building—a practice of adaption and reuse that engages the overlooked territories of the urban periphery—the project reclaims neglected typologies such as strip malls, vacant warehouses, and infrastructural voids as sites of latent spatial potential and cultural reactivation.

Drawing on a lineage of architectural critique—Venturi’s valorization of contradiction, Rossi’s notion of urban memory, Rowe’s analytical method, and Tafuri’s ideological exposure—Counterintuitive Typologies reframes typology as a tool of epistemological resistance. At its core lies the question of how such strategies might subvert the recursive logic of gentrification and instead enable inclusive, socially generative urban transformations.  While architectural history—in, for, and of architecture—forms the methodological scaffold through which typology becomes an instrument of spatial critique, this inquiry is equally grounded in design studios, theses, and built work (Figs. 2, 3), which elaborate four interlinked principles central to the project:

– Typological Reinterpretation:     Building types are not static; they evolve under cultural, economic, and ecological pressures. Misplacing or recontextualizing types becomes a strategic act—subverting both architectural convention and speculative market logic. Low-status types such as malls, warehouses, or vacant offices are re-read for their affordances—their potential to be re-scripted as civic and social infrastructure.

– Peripheral Grounds:     Peripheral territories—defined by sprawl, voids, and infrastructural residue—are reframed as repositories of latent monumentality and embodied energy. These sites offer fertile ground for spatial reimagination and projective design.

– Continual Building:     Favouring transformation over demolition, the initiative aligns with ecological ethics by advancing Umbau—a methodology of architectural reuse that engages the existing fabric as both constraint and opportunity, method and ethic.

– Material Resistance:     Against the blankness of tabula rasa urbanism and the seductions of spectacle, the projects foreground typological ambiguity and drawing as critique—tools that reveal architecture’s potential for care, repair, and redefinition. Ongoing inquiries are challenging architecture’s complicity through emphasizing historical reflexivity and typological ambiguity. Architectural designs becomes thus a method –a situated form– of resistance exactly because it is materially precise, theoretically grounded, and ecologically attuned.

By embracing peripheries, hybrid programs, and typological drift, Counterintuitive Typologies proposes an architecture that resists commodification, fosters initiative, and addresses ecological and societal urgencies. Here, design is not prophecy but care—not solution, but transformation. It embeds critique within form, matter, and memory.

Teaching and Pedagogy

Studios and seminars explore low-status environments not for novelty, but for their potential to surprise, reframe, and resist normative expectations. Emphasizing bricolage as a method—merging theory, history, and material engagement—design becomes philosophical inquiry. Students cultivate critical spatial literacy and ecological sensitivity by engaging both high- and low-status contexts as equally worthy of architectural attention (Fig. 4).


Research Initiatives and Outputs

  1. Thinking Design – Blueprint for an Architecture of Typology
    Zurich: Park Books, 2021 (Fig. 2, 3, 4)
    A visual taxonomy of 144 case studies across 12 typologies, spanning antiquity to the present. Eschews abstraction in favour of analogical clarity. The appended booklet introduces the first series of Counterintuitive Typologies,  first time presented at TU Graz Architectural Research Lecture Series, Winter Semester 2021/22.

  2. CBT – Counterintuitive Building Types (2022–2025)
    Funded by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG)
    Investigates the adaptive reuse of underutilized commercial typologies (e.g., strip malls) to explore new cultural and civic potentials. (Principal Investigator: Andreas Lechner)

  3. Architectural Affordances – Typologies of Umbau (2023–2025)
    Funded by DAStU – Politecnico di Milano
    Co-led by Gennaro Postiglione, the project examines the inherent potential of existing structures to enable spatial and social transformation, featuring 30 international case studies in architectural reuse.

  4. Peripheries – Peripherocene (2023–2026)
    With Cameron McEwan, Northumbria University, UK
    Explores the ecological and architectural significance of peripheral landscapes in the Anthropocene. Forthcoming as a special issue of The Journal of Architecture (2025).



Fig. 5 
Posters of “Counterintuitive Typologies” design studios at TU Graz 2020 to 2023.   

Selected References


Venturi, R. (1966). Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture. New York: Museum of Modern Art.

Rossi, A. (1982). The Architecture of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rowe, C. (1976). The Mathematics of the Ideal Villa and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tafuri, M. (1976). Architecture and Utopia: Design and Capitalist Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lechner, A. (2021). Thinking Design: Blueprint for an Architecture of Typology. Zurich: Park Books.




 






Architectural Affordances – Typologies of Umbau





Architectural Affordances – Typologies of Umbau is the result of perennial research and teaching by Andreas Lechner and Gennaro Postiglione at Politecnico di Milano. Edited in collaboration with Francesca Serrazanetti and Maike Gold, it investigates 30 international Umbau projects—architectural transformations—through three temporal scales: those spanning centuries, those exceeding a hundred years, and those occurring within a single century. Each project's material and functional transformation history is illustrated with one plan, section, and elevation, alongside yellow-red diagrams that trace the stages of change.  

︎︎︎Book Preview


︎︎︎More

Andreas Lechner, Gennaro Postiglione, Francesca Serrazanetti, Maike Gold, eds. Architectural Affordances – Typologies of Umbau, Naples: Thymos Books 2025, 312 pages, English, ISBN 978-88-32072-56-3



The book 'Architectural Affordances – Typologies of Umbau' is the result of perennial research and teaching by Andreas Lechner and Gennaro Postiglione at Politecnico di Milano. The projects featured in the book were selected through an international call for papers, with a scientific committee curating the most thought-provoking and exemplary submissions. Central to the book is the exploration of the dynamic interplay between enduring structural elements and temporary components, illustrating architecture's ability to adapt to shifting societal and temporal demands. Traditional buildings demonstrate their versatility through established typologies, enabling diverse and enduring uses over time. In contrast, contemporary construction—often characterized by the separation of structural frameworks and building envelopes—introduces new complexities that call for inventive, autonomous, and adaptive design strategies.


Fig. Comparative Tableau of projects in the First Category - “Formal” 


At the core of the book are architectural drawings, which function not only as records of transformation but also as essential generative tools within the discipline, bridging historical precedents with future architectural paradigms. By uncovering the affordances embedded within built forms, the book develops a contemporary, "drawn" theory of transformation, offering nuanced perspectives on some of the most pressing issues in architectural practice today. Supplemented with essays and Hermann Czech’s seminal 1997 text 'Umbau', this book is an essential resource for architects, scholars, and students. It encourages rethinking adaptation and reuse as vital strategies within contemporary architectural practice.




Fig. Comparative Tableau of projects in the Second Category - “Representational”


The interplay among different time-periods creates gaps that we, as architects, bridge creatively through drawing. Therefore, architectural drawing plays a central role in the book not only as a form of notation for architectural ideas, allowing us to forge new/old bridges towards a theory of transformation, but also as evidence and recognition of the generative potentials of architectural types. These affordances in Typologies of Umbau illustrate a familiar tension. Historical buildings seemingly align with architectural types – as formal structures or concepts of organizing forms that give architectural elements a recognizable order, allowing for centuries of diverse uses and adaptations. With the potential separation of the building envelope from the load-bearing structure in modern construction, the designer is required to make a further effort and challenge, both in terms of interpretation and autonomy.




Fig. Comparative Tableau of projects in the Third Category - “Ambiguous”




Fig. Biographies of Authors and Ccontributors


Scientific Committee

Matthias Ballestrem (Bauhaus Earth)
Marco Bovati (Politecnico di Milano)
Antonio Carvalho (Politecnico di Milano)
Lorenzo De Chiffre (TU Wien)
Victoria Easton (ETH Zürich)
Andreas Lechner (TU Graz)
Angelo Lunati (Politecnico di Milano)
Gennaro Postiglione (Politecnico di Milano)
Paola Scala (Università di Napoli, Federico II)

Coordination

Maike Gold (TU Graz)
Francesca Serrazanetti (Politecnico di Milano)



Andreas Lechner, Gennaro Postiglione, Francesca Serrazanetti, Maike Gold, eds. Architectural Affordances – Typologies of Umbau, Naples: Thymos Books 2025, 312 pages, English, ISBN 978-88-32072-56-3



Thinking Design: Blueprint for an Architecture of Typology (Zurich 2021) 


“Lechner's work is compelling and stimulating. He draws on the analytical and typological processes associated w ith Aldo Rossi's (1966, 1982) reading of cities as a composition of monuments - permanent traces, and collective memory - but Lechner applies those approaches to interpret city edges, commercial vernacular, and the urban periphery. There is an identifiable allegiance to Rossi mixed with Venturi and Scott Brown (1972, 1991), and John Hejduk (1985) as reference points. What seems significant and admirable in Lechner's writing, projects, and teaching is that intellectual culture and creative intuitive approaches are kept in close proximity to the critical rational tradition.”


Cameron McEwan, The Journal of Architecture and Urbanism (2022)




︎︎︎ Monograph 




Book Review by Cameron McEwan: Peripheral Monuments: Book Review of Thinking Design - Blueprint for an architecture of typology by Andreas Lechner”, in: Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, Volume 46/1 (2022), 83-88, 
https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2022.16904

"Thinking Design provides an important critical overview for theories and projects of typology and will offer a useful compendium for the student and teacher of architecture as well as the critical practitioner. Yet Thinking Design also offers an original theoretical reflection on the status of the urban periphery and opens questions about architecture and architectural design research as a practice of critical inquiry. In the face of the capitalist debris and the uneven space that is the hallmark of urban peripheries as a global condition, we might return to some of the 144 typologies that Lechner presents as inspiring examples; or study the striking suite of projects by students under Lechner’s supervision, which are compiled in the appended booklet. Lechner offers inspiring reflections, strong examples, and useful models for what may become the peripheral monuments of tomorrow."


Review in French / en français:   Guillemette Morel-Journel, in: DA – D’Architectures, 303 (Nov. 2022):

https://www.darchitectures.com/thinking-design-blueprint-an-architecture-of-typology-a6149.html

"Thinking Design: Blueprint for an Architecture of Typology" by Andreas Lechner explores the essence of architectural design, emphasizing the primacy of form and its role as a backdrop for human coexistence. The book is divided into two parts: three essays and drawings of 144 architectural projects with brief descriptions. These sections, although loosely related, overlap in their search for terminology and an ordering system to distinguish generic from particular aspects.

The author developed the book based on lectures at the Graz University of Technology, evolving the content over the years. The selection of projects reflects a continuous presence of the past in architecture, making it tangible for design teaching. The book acknowledges the complex nature of architectural production, influenced by practical, theoretical, artistic, and technological factors, without attempting to resolve the tension between the objective and the subjective. The book argues that architectural designs, seemingly pre-linguistic, serve as literal reflections of prevailing social circumstances. The book delves into three chapters: "Tectonics," "Type," and "Topos," examining architecture's attempt to establish its identity as a social and cultural force. It explores the tension between the general and the particular in building design, emphasizing the importance of this dichotomy. The concepts of "tectonics," "type," and "topos" are introduced as autoreferential rather than rigid design standards. Lechner intentionally avoids focusing on technical, historical, or local details in the representation of projects, highlighting the generic aspect of architectural bodies and their relationship with repetition. The book argues that design derives its creative power from the interplay between originality and repetition.

The chapters "Tectonics," "Type," and "Topos" address the tension between form and function, examining architecture's role as a cultural and social construct. Lechner introduces the notions of "state," "recreation," and "surveillance" to underscore the sociopolitical dimension of spatial-structural contexts. He argues that the inherent relation between form and function is not arbitrary but ambiguous. Lechner discusses the critique of Late-Modernist architecture, tracing the development of architectural typology through different eras. The book highlights the importance of theory in architecture, emphasizing a broad and open approach to design education.

The first chapter, "Tectonics," provides an overview of the book's structure, literature, and project selection process. It emphasizes the practical design approach, serving as a source of ideas and reference works. The second chapter, "Type," explores the distinction between "first" and "second typology" and introduces the postfunctionalist and urbanistic-atmospheric typology in the third chapter, "Topos." The book discusses the broader concept of type in architecture, emphasizing its relevance as “professional memory” despite changing demands. Lechner acknowledges the productive dimension of vagueness and polemics in the architectural design process, presenting the 144 projects as a selection that illustrates a design aspect based on typological understanding. "Thinking Design" thus offers a comprehensive exploration of architectural design, addressing the complex interplay between form, function, and societal context.

The book provides a nuanced perspective on typology and emphasizes the negotiation of architectural knowledge through composition and transformative design processes.


However disparate the style or ethos, beneath architecture's pluralism lies a number of categorical typologies. In Thinking Design, Austrian architect Andreas Lechner has condensed his profound typological understanding into a single book. Divided into three chapters - Tectonics, Type, and Topos - Lechner's book reflects upon twelve fundamental typologies: theater, museum, library, state, office, recreation, religion, retail, factory, education, surveillance, and hospital. Encompassing a total of 144 carefully selected examples of classic designs and buildings, ranging across an epic sweep from antiquity to the present, the book not only explains the fundamentals of collective architectural knowledge but traces the interconnected reiterations that lie at the heart of architecture’s transformative power. As such, Thinking Design outlines a new building theory rooted in the act of composition as an aesthetic determinant of architectural form. This emphasis on composition in the design process over the more commonplace aspects of function, purpose, or atmosphere makes it more than a mere planning manual. It reveals also the cultural dimension of architecture that gives it the ability to transcend not only use cycles but entire epochs. Each example is meticulously illustrated with a newly drawn elevation or axonometric projection, floor plan, and section, not only invigorating the underlying ideas but also making the book an ideal comparative compendium.

An enclosed booklet (32 pages, 19.5 x 28 cm, 58 b-w illustrations) features theses by twelve students of Graz University of Technology that further illustrate Andreas Lechner's approach in teaching and design.

1st edition, Park Books: Zurich 2021,
Hardback, 460 pages, 444 b-w illustrations and plans
23 x 31 cm

ISBN 978-3-03860-246-0















GAM – Graz Architecture Magazine


Founded by the Faculty of Architecture of Graz University of Technology in 2004, GAM – Graz Architecture Magazine publishes essays, interviews, illustrations, book reviews and projects related to the fields of architecture and urbanism. It is conceived as an engaging interdisciplinary forum for scholars, architects, and critics in which architectural developments and controversial phenomena are discussed. Since 2017 Andreas is co-editor and responsible for the book review section.



︎︎︎


Adding to current architectural discourse, the contributions of each issue are devoted to a specific theme that is chosen by a guest editor. All submissions to GAM undergo a blind peer review process by members of the editorial board as well as external reviewers specializing in a certain field relevant to the theme of the issue. GAM is published bilingually (German/English) and is distributed by JOVIS Verlag. The editors of GAM are comprised of members of the Faculty of Architecture of Graz University of Technology: Daniel Gethmann (Executive Editor), Petra Eckhard (Managing Editor), Urs Hirschberg (Editor), Andreas Lechner (Book Reviews), Petra Petersson (Faculty News) and Annalena Arminger (Coordinator Faculty News).

Editorial Board

The editorial board includes Michelle Addington (Texas), Anita Berrizbeitia (Cambridge, MA), Pierre-Alain Croset (Milan), Susanne Hauser (Berlin), Andrej Hrausky (Ljubljana), Bart Lootsma (Karlsruhe), Gerhard Schmitt (Zurich) und Georg Schöllhammer (Vienna).

Andreas Lechner Co-Editor / Book review editor 

GAM 22. (2026)
GAM 21. (2025) 
GAM 20. (2024)
GAM 19. Professionalism (2023) doi.org/10.1515/9783986120078
GAM 18. Beyond the Institution (2022) ISBN 978-3-86859-858-2
GAM 17 Wood. Rethinking Material (2021) ISBN 978-3-86859-663-2 
GAM 16 gewohnt: un/common (2020) 
GAM 15 Territorial Justice (2019) ISBN 978-3-86859-855-1
GAM 14 Exhibiting Matters (2018) ISBN 978-3-86859-854-4





ARCHITEKT ANDREAS LECHNER
Attemsgasse 11
8010 Graz, AT

 

Staatlich befugter und beeideter Ziviltechniker

Email · T+43 664 130 3255 · UID ATU75588801

© Studio Andreas Lechner. All rights reserved. 

Unless otherwise stated, all materials on this website and the ideas incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights belonging to Andreas Lechner, its affiliates or its licensors and all such rights are hereby asserted and reserved. No part of this website may be copied, reproduced, republished, posted, transmitted or distributed in any way for commercial purposes. Any modification or use of the information contained on this website for any purpose not explicitly permitted without prior written consent is a violation of the author’s intellectual property rights and is strictly prohibited. 

︎︎︎Imprint & DSGVO